shamanicshaymin: Glorious beautiful Shaymin against a flowery backdrop. (PokeDads :: No More Lube)
Puri ([personal profile] shamanicshaymin) wrote2009-06-17 04:10 am

The hypocrisy is amazing.

Ganked from [livejournal.com profile] sheepyrai's journal here.

Bolding is mine:

....Somebody posts a picture of topless Fran. Awesome! Boobies!

Then I make the mistake of reading their description.

"Anyhow. If you are offended by this? Well, I don't know what to say other than "grow up". Not only does it have "Nude" in the title, there is a mature content warning. You can also read this description before viewing the picture.
Just for future information.
I'm not sensitive to many things. If you see a graphic novel from me, there will be female nudity (males will be censored), gore, and possibly even sex. *gasp* I try to be conservative, because of this over-sensitive world nowadays. I'm sorry; I grew up with Bond movies (if that constitutes anything).

Sorry to rant, but I think this is a pressing issue that some people need to open their eyes to. *coughmorethanhalfofUSAcough*"


Sheepy points this out to the artist, and gets this response:

"Because I don't think a penis is attractive? Don't get me wrong, I'm all for males, but I just think the unowut isn't necessary to show. Censoring boobs is just...dumb."

Uh huh. We're allowed to do whatever we like with women (Don't like tits? ZOMG U PRUDE) but you can't show guybits unless they're giant and veiny and injected with steroids. 'Cause PINGAS = EWWWWWWW!!!11!1!1 Heaven forbid someone finds them *gasp* attractive without being ridiculous supergiants. Quick! Chop off the Statue of David's "unowut" since nudity = pr0n!

Silly PINGAS, pr0n is for tits!

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting